Above: TIMe-Ge molecules on Si(100): 77 K STM scanning. (a) Experimental constant-current filled-states 77 K STM image of four TIMe-Ge molecules on Si(100)-(2×1) (I = 50 pA, V −2.0 V). Molecule deposition was performed onto a room temperature Si(100) substrate. (b) The four symmetry-equivalent on-dimer configurations of TIMe-Ge. An experimental STM tri-lobe is overlaid on the central triply-iodinated proxy. (c,d) Representative 77 K STM images of TIMe-Ge molecules deposited on Si(100) substrates held at <240 K and >400 K, respectively, prior to imaging. The dashed white ellipse in (c) marks a pair of dissociated, surface-bound iodine atoms. A minor low-pass inverse fast Fourier transform filter has been applied to highlight TIMe-Ge positions on the Si lattice. z = 0 for STM heights is referenced to the highest point of the Si dimer-row surface. Figure 2 in the article.
Those keeping track of diamondoid mechanosynthesis research of the mid-to-late 2000's and the very small number of us engaged in this very specific activity may note that the last of these papers was published in 2011 before effectively disappearing completely from academic (publication) activities. Those taking extra steps to keep track of those activities will note that the journal article submissions were replaced by patent applications. Lots of and lots of patent applications.
Saving the history of the 2010's and some of the early 2020's for a far future post, I am very pleased to report that the first academic and experimental foray into the applications of molecular tools for interesting future applications has been posted to arXiv recently (journal article acceptance to hopefully follow) thanks to the efforts of a very large and diverse group of researchers at CBN Nano Technologies (of which I am proud to call myself one).
Direct Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16798
Here, synthesized and activate-able molecules are deposited on Si100 and present, upon activation, nearly the smallest feedstock one could come up with for the carbon-based mechanosynthesis of anything – CH2.
I point out as a particular highlight the consideration of design criteria for molecules we and others might want to use in the future for varied applications, which are listed below in a highly less-verbose form than the original draft included:
- High molecular symmetry (makes many considerations easier)
- Covalent bond formation (these are not weakly-bonding fragments)
- “Loose legs, rigid body” (for surface sampling)
- Lattice-matching (Legs "… should be at least long enough to reach from his body to the ground." – A. Lincoln)
- Confidence in surface-bound orientations (nice to know they're there when you look)
- An accessible, stable radical on the surface-bound molecule (the "business-end")
This work begins to bridge the gap between Molecular Toolsets (as proposed by Rob and Ralph) and demonstrations of molecules that contain functional groups that can be used for similar applications. As such, this work is partly "on the path" and, in light of all that was learned to get this specific work to the point of publication, partly identifying where one should start walking in the first place.
Still thinking small…
Authors: Taleana Huff, Brandon Blue, Terry McCallum, Mathieu Morin, Damian G. Allis, Rafik Addou, Jeremy Barton, Adam Bottomley, Doreen Cheng, Nina M. Ćulum, Michael Drew, Tyler Enright, Alan T.K. Godfrey, Ryan Groome, Aru J. Hill, Alex Inayeh, Matthew R. Kennedy, Robert J. Kirby, Mykhaylo Krykunov, Sam Lilak, Hadiya Ma, Cameron J. Mackie, Oliver MacLean, Jonathan Myall, Ryan Plumadore, Adam Powell, Henry Rodriguez, Luis Sandoval, Marc Savoie, Benjamin Scheffel, Marco Taucer, Denis A.B. Therien, Dušan Vobornik
Abstract: Scanning probe microscopy (SPM) investigations of on-surface chemistry on passivated silicon have only shown in-plane chemical reactions, and studies on bare silicon are limited in facilitating additional reactions post-molecular-attachment. Here, we enable subsequent reactions on Si(100) through selectively adsorbing 3D, silicon-specific "molecular tools". Following an activation step, the molecules present an out-of-plane radical that can function both to donate or accept molecular fragments, thereby enabling applications across multiple scales, e.g., macroscale customizable silicon-carbon coatings or nanoscale tip-mediated mechanosynthesis. Creation of many such molecular tools is enabled by broad molecular design criteria that facilitate reproducibility, surface specificity, and experimental verifiability. These criteria are demonstrated using a model molecular tool tetrakis(iodomethyl)germane (Ge(CH2I)4; TIMe-Ge), with experimental validation by SPM and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and theoretical support by density functional theory (DFT) investigations. With this framework, a broad and diverse range of new molecular engineering capabilities are enabled on silicon.
As someone that mostly follows the developments in this field from outside:
Congratulations on the paper, it's nice to see this work finally public!
I was impressed by how simple the "tooltips" used here were, both structurally and synthetically (two-steps!), certainly much simpler than the substituted adamantanes in the patents.
Was hard to imagine that a single Ge atom was enough to count as a "rigid" body though (relative to the adamantane-based bodies).
It's not obvious to what degree this can be adapted to other surfaces, but obviously the general idea/design criteria could be used to find something compatible for other surfaces.
Is there an intention for future publications that will explore various moieties connected to the Ge atom, to functionalize it further?
What about some mechanosynthesis demonstrations after that, or is that not planned for now?
My thanks for the look and the comment! To hit the four items:
1. Ge rigidity – there are far fewer degrees of freedom in a single atom than the entire cage (just throwing it out there), but certainly all of the bonds to it are weaker. In the context of a molecular tool, the notion is that "rigid" cores would be (ideally) excluding rotational, torsional, and flat-out conformational degrees of freedom in the core of the molecule such that you're not "searching" for any single part of it while imaging and simulating.
2. Adaptability – agreed. The "lattice-matching" criterion is where the… extra-molecular quality of the tool is most important (and can significantly reduce the design space of the molecule, as well as complicate hitting the other criteria significantly. There is a history there, including in the patents.). With a different application, chemistry, and surface in place, one would walk through the process as far back to the ground floor as necessary. The relationships to the patents and all of the published Ge molecular tool work in the past are, I would argue, quite direct in the distillation to critical needs and accessible chemistry as presented in the paper.
3. Intention & Demonstration – and apologies for the non-answer, but the directions, disclosures, and timetables of either/both/neither are up to people at CBN (perhaps this is where the "academic" nature of the effort ends). Speaking for myself, you can guess where I stand(!).